With the release of ISO/IEC 42001:2023, there has been a noticeable excitement regarding the establishment of a management system designed to effectively oversee the implementation of AI and its associated applications. It is also known that prior to release this management system there were quite a few standards, Guidelines, technical papers were released in last two years and there are a few which are under development.
Also, it is apparent that the standards, methods, and frameworks pertaining to AI must encompass aspects of data and security.
This article delves into the prominent AI/Data/Security related standards, particularly focusing on key ISO/IEC standards (Note: the list provided is for illustrative purpose only and may not be exhaustive).
A further examination reveals that these standards encompass various types of documentation, including Management Systems, Guidelines, Standards, Frameworks, Technical Specifications/Reports, Vocabulary, and more (additional details on the document types can be found on the ISO.ORG website).
(This write-up refers to all such documents as standards for the ease of use.)
Kudos to International Standards Organizations like ISO/IEC and national bodies such as BSI, ANSI, DIN, etc., for their commendable efforts in ensuring the establishment of such standards, contributing significantly to the robustness and trustworthiness of these systems.
Following diagram illustrates these key standards.
The recent release of the AI Management System is noteworthy, given the plethora of guidelines and technical specifications available since 2021 for organizational use. The application of Generative AI, along with the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in business functions, underscores the need for organizations to adopt these models judiciously. It is crucial to strategically approach the adoption and carefully consider the associated risks.
The risks linked to adoption, particularly concerning data/model bias and system implications, outweigh the benefits. Some of these established standards outline prerequisites such as Management commitment, appropriate structure, relevant tools, enhanced controls, deliberate efforts to reduce bias, ethical practices, improved testing and assessment mechanisms, and robust quality assurance processes.
From a security standpoint, robust cybersecurity practices and effective risk management are imperative. The ISO 27001 (ISMS) standard has played a significant role in recent years, gaining added importance in the context of AI adoption. Standards addressing risks related to AI adoption are pivotal considerations.
On the data front, standards defining the Data Life Cycle Framework or ensuring Data Quality for Analytics in Machine Learning, as well as those pertaining to Process Management for Big Data, are fundamental. These standards play a key role in establishing comprehensive data management practices across the entire data life cycle.
Below is the compiled list of standards
Standards |
Institution |
Type |
Domain |
Stage |
ISO 31000:2018 |
ISO/IEC |
Guideline |
Risk management |
Published – Feb 2018 (under Review now) |
ISO/IEC FDIS 5339 |
ISO/IEC |
Guideline |
Guideline for AI Applications |
Under Development |
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 |
ISO/IEC |
Management System |
Information Technology — Artificial intelligence — Management system |
Published – Dec 2023 |
ISO/IEC 24029-2:2023 |
ISO/IEC |
Assessment |
Assessment of the robustness of neural networks Part 2 |
Published – Aug 2023 |
ISO/IEC 8183:2023 |
ISO/IEC |
Framework |
Artificial intelligence – Data life cycle framework |
Published – Jul 2023 |
ISO/IEC 25059:2023, |
ISO/IEC |
Quality Models |
Quality Models for AI |
Published – June 2023 |
ISO/IEC 23894:2023 |
ISO/IEC |
Guideline |
guidelines for risk management of AI applications. |
Published – Feb 2023 |
AS ISO/IEC 24668:2022 |
ISO/IEC |
Framework |
Process management framework for big data analytics |
Published – Nov 2022 |
ISO/IEC 2382:2015 |
ISO/IEC |
Vocabulary / Terminology |
Information technology |
Published – May 2015, Corrected version Oct 2022 |
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 |
ISO/IEC |
Management System |
Information security management systems Requirements |
Published – Oct 2022 |
ISO/IEC 22989 |
ISO/IEC |
Vocabulary / Terminology / Taxonomy |
AI concepts and Terminology |
Published – July 2022 Amendment is in progress |
ISO/IEC 23053:2022 |
ISO/IEC |
Framework |
Framework for AI Systems Using ML |
Published – June 2022 |
ISO/IEC 38507:2022 |
ISO/IEC |
Guideline |
Governance implications of the use of artificial intelligence by organizations |
Published – Apr 2022 |
ISO/IEC 27701 |
ISO/IEC |
Framework |
Privacy Information Management – extension to ISO/IEC 27001 |
Published – Aug 2019 |
IEC 62243:2012 |
IEC |
Standard |
Artificial Intelligence Exchange and Service Tie to All Test Environments (AI-ESTATE) |
Published – Jun 2012 |
ISO/IEC DIS 5259-1 |
ISO/IEC |
Vocabulary / Terminology / Taxonomy |
Data quality for analytics and machine learning |
Under Development |
ISO/IEC CD 12792 |
ISO/IEC |
Vocabulary / Terminology / Taxonomy |
AI Transparency Taxonomy |
Under Development |
ISO/IEC TR 27563:2023 |
ISO/IEC |
Technical Report |
Use Cases – Security & Privacy in AI |
Published – May 2023 |
ISO/IEC TR 24368:2022 |
ISO/IEC |
Technical Report |
overviews of ethical and societal considerations |
Published – Aug 2022 |
ISO/IEC TR 24372:2021 |
ISO/IEC |
Technical Report |
Overview of computational approaches for AI systems |
Published – Dec 2021 |
ISO/IEC TR 24027:2021 |
ISO/IEC |
Technical Report |
Bias in AI systems and AI aided decision making |
Published – Nov 2021 |
ISO/IEC TR 24030:2021 |
ISO/IEC |
Technical Report |
AI Use Cases |
Published – May 2021- being revised to ISO/IEC DTR 24030 |
ISO/TR 24291:2021 |
ISO/IEC |
Technical Report |
Applications of ML in Imaging and Medical Applications |
Published – Mar 2021 |
ISO/TR 22100-5:2021 |
ISO/IEC |
Technical Report |
Safety of machinery |
Published – Jan 2021 |
ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 |
ISO/IEC |
Technical Report |
Overview of trustworthiness in artificial intelligence |
Published – May 2020 |
ISO/IEC 4213:2022 |
ISO/IEC |
Technical Report |
Assessment of machine learning classification performance |
Published – Oct 2022 |
ISO/IEC DTS 25058 |
ISO/IEC |
Technical Specification |
Guidance for Quality of AI |
Under Publication – 60.00 |
ISO/IEC TS 12791 |
ISO/IEC |
Technical Specification |
Unwanted Bias |
Under Development |
ISO/IEC CD TS 8200 |
ISO/IEC |
Technical Specification (DTS) |
Controllability of automated AI systems |
Under Development |
(Stage as of 31st Dec 2023)
Conclusion:
Standards play a pivotal role in implementing strong mechanisms throughout the entire process of planning, establishing an organization, designing, building, assessing, deploying, and continuously monitoring AI systems within an organization. The combination of standards, architectural and technical frameworks, tools, as well as adherence to governing laws and regulations, collectively contributes to the development of resilient, ethical AI solutions that not only benefit humanity at large but also enhance productivity and foster innovation. It is an exciting time and we look forward to development in the area of standards in the coming years.
Acknowledgements:
ISO.Org, AiThougts.Org, AI Standards.org
No Comments yet!