Skip to main content

The ‘Ops’ in the GenAI World

The world of AI and its operational cousins can feel like an alphabet soup: AIOps, MLOps, DataOps, and now, GenAIOps. The key lies in understanding their distinct roles and how they can collaborate to deliver full potential of your Gen AI adoption and data investments.

Definitions

AIOps, which stands for Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations, is a rapidly evolving field that aims to leverage AI and machine learning to automate and optimize various tasks within IT operations.

MLOps, is a set of practices and tools that bring DevOps principles to the world of machine learning. It aims to automate and streamline the development, deployment, and maintenance of machine learning models in production.

DataOps, is essentially a set of practices, processes, and technologies that aim to improve the management and delivery of data products and applications. It borrows heavily from the DevOps methodology, applies it to the world of data.

GenAIOps, is the emerging field that applies the principles of AIOps, DataOps and MLOps to the specific challenges of managing and optimizing Generative AI systems.

Key Activities and Benefits

The table below captures the key objectives, activities and benefits of these ‘Ops’ areas.

Area Key Objectives Main Activities Benefits
AIOps Optimize AI infrastructure and operations ·    Automate manual tasks (incident detection, root cause analysis, remediation)
·    Improve monitoring and analytics (AI-powered analysis of IT data)
·    Proactive prediction and prevention (issue prediction from historical data)
·    Enhance collaboration and decision-making (unified platform for IT teams)
·    Reduced downtime and costs
·    Improved AI performance
·    Faster problem resolution
·    More informed decision-making
MLOps Ensure efficient and reliable ML lifecycle ·    Automate ML pipeline (data pre-processing, training, deployment, monitoring)
·    Foster collaboration and communication (break down silos between teams)
·    Implement governance and security (compliance, ethical guidelines)
·    Faster time to market for ML models
·    Increased model accuracy and reliability
·    Improved model governance and compliance
·    Reduced risk of model failures
DataOps Improve data quality, availability, and accessibility ·    Automate data pipelines (ingestion, transformation, delivery)
·    Implement data governance and quality control (standardization, validation)
·    Monitor data quality and lineage
·    Improved data quality and trust
·    Better decision-making
·    Increased data accessibility and efficiency
·    Reduced data-related errors
GenAIOps Streamline and automate generative AI development and operations ·    Automate Generative AI pipelines (data preparation, training, output generation)
·    Monitor and manage Generative AI models (bias detection, remediation)
·    Implement governance and safety controls (bias mitigation, explainability tools)
·    Optimize resource allocation and cost management
·    Facilitate collaboration and communication
·    Faster development and deployment of generative AI applications
·    Improved innovation and creativity
·    Efficient management of generative AI models
·    Reduced risk of bias and ethical issues in generative AI outputs

Comparative view

Because implementing GenAIOps would mostly require deploying MLOPs, DataOps and AIOPs also, it would be worthwhile to analyze distinctions and overlaps.

AIOps and MLOps

One uses AI, while the other applies DevOps principles.

AIOps:

  • Focus: Applying AI to improve IT operations as a whole.
  • Goals: Automate tasks, improve monitoring and analytics, predict and prevent issues, enhance collaboration and decision-making.
  • Examples: Using AI to detect network anomalies, automate incident resolution, or predict server failures.

MLOps:

  • Focus: Operationalizing and managing machine learning models effectively.
  • Goals: Automate the ML pipeline, deploy and monitor models in production, optimize performance, and ensure reliable and scalable operation.
  • Examples: Automating data pre-processing for model training, continuously monitoring model accuracy and bias, or automatically rolling back models when performance degrades.

Key Differences:

  • Scope: AIOps is broader, focusing on all aspects of IT operations, while MLOps is specifically about managing ML models.
  • Approach: AIOps uses AI as a tool for existing IT processes, while MLOps aims to fundamentally change how ML models are developed, deployed, and managed.
  • Impact: AIOps can improve the efficiency and reliability of IT operations, while MLOps can accelerate the adoption and impact of ML models in real-world applications.

Overlap and Synergy:

  • There is some overlap between AIOps and MLOps, especially in areas like monitoring and automation.
  • They can work together synergistically: AIOps can provide data and insights to improve MLOps, and MLOps can develop AI-powered tools that benefit AIOps.

So, while their core goals differ, AIOps and MLOps are complementary approaches that can together drive AI adoption and optimize both IT operations and ML models.

MLOps and GenAIOps

In the sense of focusing on operationalizing models, MLOps and GenAIOps share a similar core objective. Both aim to streamline the processes involved in deploying, monitoring, and maintaining models in production effectively. However, there are some key differences that distinguish them:

Type of models:

  • MLOps: Primarily focuses on managing traditional machine learning models used for tasks like classification, regression, or forecasting.
  • GenAIOps: Specifically deals with operationalizing Generative AI models capable of generating creative outputs like text, images, code, or music.

Challenges and complexities:

  • MLOps: Faces challenges like data quality and bias, model performance monitoring, and resource optimization.
  • GenAIOps: Grapples with additional complexities due to the unique nature of Generative AI, including:
    • Data diversity and bias: Ensuring diversity and mitigating bias in training data, as Generative AI models are particularly sensitive to these issues.
    • Explainability and interpretability: Providing tools and techniques to understand how Generative AI models make decisions and interpret their outputs, both for developers and users.
    • Ethical and regulatory considerations: Addressing ethical concerns and complying with relevant regulations surrounding Generative AI applications.

Tools and techniques:

  • MLOps: Tools for automating data pipelines, deploying models, monitoring performance, and managing resources might be sufficient.
  • GenAIOps: May require specialized tools and techniques tailored to address the unique challenges of Generative AI, such as:
    • Bias detection and mitigation tools: To identify and address potential biases in training data and model outputs.
    • Explainability frameworks: To facilitate understanding of how Generative AI models make decisions.
    • Content filtering and moderation tools: To ensure safe and responsible generation of outputs.

While both MLOps and GenAIOps share the general goal of operationalizing models, the specific challenges and complexities faced by Generative AI necessitate the development of specialized tools and practices within GenAIOps.

Collaboration:

  • AIOps and GenAIOps: These fields can coexist and complement each other within an organization. AIOps focuses on broader IT operations, while GenAIOps specifically addresses the unique challenges of managing Generative AI models. They can share data and insights to improve overall AI-driven decision-making and optimization.
  • MLOps and GenAIOps: While both focus on model operationalization, GenAIOps can be considered a specialized subset of MLOps that addresses the unique needs of Generative AI models. In organizations heavily invested in Generative AI, GenAIOps practices might naturally subsume the broader MLOps practices, ensuring tailored governance and operational efficiency for these advanced models.

Integration considerations:

  • Scope and Focus: Clearly define the scope of each field within your organization to ensure alignment and avoid overlap.
  • Tooling and Infrastructure: Evaluate whether existing MLOps tools can adequately support GenAIOps requirements or if specialized tools are needed.
  • Skill Sets: Foster cross-team collaboration and knowledge sharing to bridge gaps between different AIOps, MLOps, and GenAIOps teams. This is one of the most important considerations to keep operations cost down.

Summary and Future Outlook

  • AIOps and GenAIOps can coexist and collaborate for broader IT optimization and responsible Generative AI management.
  • GenAIOps can subsume MLOps practices in organizations with a strong focus on Generative AI, ensuring tailored governance and efficiency.
  • This convergence could lead to more comprehensive platforms and tools that address the entire AI lifecycle, from development to deployment, monitoring, and maintenance.

References

  1. What is AIOps? : https://www.ibm.com/topics/aiops
  2. What is MLOps and Why It Matters: https://www.databricks.com/glossary/mlops
  3. GenAIOps: Evolving the MLOps Framework: https://towardsdatascience.com/genaiops-evolving-the-mlops-framework-b0012f936379
  4. AI Project Management: The Roadmap to Success with AI, DataOps, and GenAIOps: https://www.techopedia.com/ai-project-management-the-roadmap-to-success-with-mlops-dataops-and-genaiops

AI and AIOps – a perspective for IT Services Industry

AI and AIOps – a perspective for IT Services Industry

This write-up is to discuss about AIOps from the perspective of IT Services Industry and how possibly one need to shift towards bringing the benefits/efficiencies of AIOps at the Service Delivery / Service Consumption level.

There are definitive steps taken currently in the AIOps community to shift left from ITOPs to DevOps.

One can see that AIOps practices are making their headway into even pre-production activities with definite focus on predictive remedies, in order to build and deploy robust services.

This blog is looking at how AIOps is helping in the area of ITSM/DevOps areas and also brainstorming on how one could start integrating these practices / solutions into Service Delivery / Service Consumption areas.

Ever since Gartner coined the term AIOps, way back in 2016-17, the market has grown significantly and is expected to grow very fast in the coming years (one estimates that it will grow in the range of 20%-25% CAGR and may cross $40bn in next few years).

This phenomenal growth is attributed to

        Larger Digital transformation across IT Estates

        Varied and disparate platform / sources where the estates reside including cloud agnostic solutions

        Ever growing data across the estate (Engagement, Observational data)

        Larger, faster releases and deployments

The overall goal is to capture all data generated across the IT Estate, store, analyse, provide insights, and provide fixes thru appropriate automation. In this two aspects that play critical role are Big Data and Analytics thru Machine learning.

The following diagram is representative of how AIOps is playing role at various levels.

AIOps – In Operations

·        AIOps solutions are very strong in the area of ITOM, ITSM

·        Typical Solutions that are available currently

o   Domain-centric (domains like Application Monitoring, Log Monitoring, Network monitoring) (Examples of some products/Product companies Dynatrace, Datadog, ScienceLogic, S1 Platform, Zenoss, IPsoft etc.)

o   Domain-agnostic solutions available (works across disparate services and working across domains in IT environment) (Examples of some products/Product companies Big Panda, ServiceNow, BMC,  Elasticsearch, IBM Cloud Pak, CISCO App Dynamics,  Moogsoft, DataDog, Zenoss, Splunk etc.)

·    Personas: These are largely IT Operations personas, Service Delivery Personas – such as System Engineer, Site Reliability Engineers, Operations Engineer, Security Professionals, and Service Desk etc.

·    Process involves – Predict Service Failures, determine appropriate root causes and propose remediation and in some cases fix the issues before they affect the services.

·  Typical features involve Predictive Analytics, Predictive maintenance, Solution Recommendations, Creating knowledge articles, Intelligent Autoresponders, Persona based Analytics etc.

·    Some benefits are :  Proactively identify potential issues before they occur, remove noise from actual alerts that need attention, Improved IT Productivity, Improved  Utilization, Better visibility across IT estate, Optimize the spend across the estate, Better CSAT, Better relation with the business (from cost center to partner)

AIOps – in DevOps

·        As stated earlier, there is a trend to shift left – bringing AIOps practices / solutions to pre-production activities while Applications and Services Solutions are built, tested and deployed. This shift was imminent, given that Dev works very closely with OPS and has large impact in what gets designed, developed and deployed.

·        Persona – Developers, DevOps engineers, SRE Engineers

·    Some features includes – data ingestion for gaining insights while code is getting  developed and tested, proactively identifying anomalies in CI/CD pipelines, auto-remediation for such workflows (such as deployment of Pods and containers in multi cloud environment) using SLA for faster deployments and so on

·        Examples of Product/Product companies – Harness, Dynatrace, OverOps etc

·      Some Benefits are – better control on CI/CD stack, efficient use of pre-production estates, better resilient software solutions, robust design , Better productivity of DevOps community, and finally better integration with Ops

AI in Service Delivery/Consumption

·      Question is how to bring AI (and AIOps practice & discipline) into Service Delivery/Service Consumption areas and integrate the practices across Service Applications and underlying IT infrastructure to provide a complete integrated experience to the end user company / LOB owner

·        Few examples of  Service Delivery/Service Consumption could be

o   Selecting & Onboarding new resources onto Organization Platform

o   Talent Hunt with appropriate competencies

o   Allocation of competent human resource to a program

o   Allocation and management of Workplace / facilities to increase occupancy

o   Developing Market Strategy based on market / customer interests and Sales inputs

o   How to build a predictive Customer Service

o   Design and apply predictive maintenance needs in manufacturing setup

o   Detection of suspicious behaviour and persistent vulnerabilities that result in security threats across the ecosystems (& this is not restricted to IT Systems security threats but extended to threats to IPR, Knowledge Assets etc.)

·        Currently individual solutions do exist in the form of AI/ML solutions or robotic processes (including bots) in many areas including Customer Service, Healthcare, Finance, Stocks, Auto Industry, even fitness applications areas

·        In many case these, however, are not  integrated solutions or products within a given service delivery platform

·        While some of them can be integrated including digital workplace solutions (for example ServiceNow IT Service Management and ServiceNow HR Service Delivery), it will be imminent to bring the power, predictability and resilience of AIOps into Service Delivery functions too. This tight integration and convergence will help provide flawless, efficient Services to the end users.

·        It is evident that business has to spend time, money in meticulously planning for such tight end to end integrations in order to yield maximum benefit of automation at both the ends

·        Also, probably it is time now, to bring a certain standardisation in the mechanisms of doing such integrations

·        Some Examples of Product Vendors/Products :

o   Integrated HR Service Management : ServiceNow HR Service Delivery, DoveTail Employee Engagement  Suite, Oracle HR Help Cloud Service, SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central Service Center,

o   Workspace Management : ServiceNow Workplace Service Delivery,

 —————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

References:

·        Gartner Market Guide for AIOps Platforms

·        ServiceNow Workplace Service Delivery, HR Service Delivery

·        Mordor Intelligence – Market Snapshot